Toppercracker
♫
Now Playing
Ambient Radio
♫

Keep Learning?

Sign in to continue practicing.

Missing Sentence 12 / 54

The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where the given sentence best fits among the options (1), (2), (3), or (4) indicated in the paragraph.

Sentence: "These ethical quandaries are significantly exacerbated by the sheer velocity of scientific discovery, rendering preemptive policy-making extraordinarily challenging."

Paragraph: The advent of CRISPR-Cas9 technology has opened unprecedented avenues for therapeutic intervention, promising to eradicate genetic diseases and enhance human capabilities. (1). However, this profound scientific leap is accompanied by a host of intricate ethical dilemmas, particularly concerning germline editing, which can alter the human gene pool for future generations. The rapid pace of biotechnological innovation frequently outstrips the capacity of existing legal and ethical structures to respond comprehensively. (2). For instance, the distinction between somatic cell editing, which affects only the treated individual, and germline editing, with its inheritable consequences, necessitates disparate regulatory approaches. (3). Developing universally accepted guidelines is further complicated by varying cultural, religious, and philosophical perspectives across nations, leading to a fragmented and often contradictory global landscape. (4). Such a patchwork approach risks creating 'gene tourism' or fostering unregulated research havens, undermining collective efforts to ensure responsible scientific advancement.

Correct Answer: Option 2
1. Logical Contextual Analysis:
Before Option 2: The preceding sentences introduce the "intricate ethical dilemmas" of gene editing and highlight how the "rapid pace of biotechnological innovation frequently outstrips the capacity of existing legal and ethical structures to respond comprehensively."
The Inserted Sentence: This sentence directly refers to "These ethical quandaries" (linking to "intricate ethical dilemmas") and explains *why* they are difficult to address: they are "exacerbated by the sheer velocity of scientific discovery, rendering preemptive policy-making extraordinarily challenging." This directly elaborates on the idea that innovation outstrips existing structures.
After Option 2: The subsequent sentence begins with "For instance," introducing a specific example (somatic vs. germline editing) that illustrates the "disparate regulatory approaches" needed and the difficulty of policy-making, thus providing concrete support for the general statement in the inserted sentence.
2. Why the other options are incorrect:
Option 1: Placing the sentence here would be premature. The phrase "These ethical quandaries" would lack a clear antecedent, as the "intricate ethical dilemmas" are explicitly introduced only in the sentence immediately following point (1).
Option 3: This placement would disrupt the logical flow. The sentence before (3) describes a specific regulatory challenge (somatic vs. germline editing). Inserting the given sentence here would reintroduce a general point about the difficulty of policy-making due to scientific velocity after a specific example has already been provided, making it repetitive and out of sequence.
Option 4: By this point, the paragraph has moved beyond the general challenge of science outpacing regulation to discuss the international complexities and varying cultural perspectives that lead to a "fragmented and often contradictory global landscape." Inserting the sentence here would be a step backward in the logical progression of ideas.
3. Placement Summary:
The inserted sentence serves as a crucial link, explaining the primary reason for the difficulty in forming ethical and legal frameworks in gene editing by connecting the ethical dilemmas to the rapid pace of scientific discovery.

← →