All Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension (VARC) Practice

All Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension (VARC) 15 / 557

The following question has a set of four statements. Each statement can be classified as one of the following:
(i) Facts, which deal with pieces of information that one has heard, seen or read, and which are open to discovery or verification (the answer option indicates such a statement with an F)
(ii) Inferences, which are conclusions drawn about the unknown, on the basis of the known (the answer option indicates such a statement with an I)
(iii) Judgements, which are opinions that imply approval or disapproval of persons, objects, situations and occurrences in the past, the present or the future (the answer option indicates such a statement with a J)
Identify the Fact (F), Judgement (J) and Inference (I) from these sentences.

Statements:

1. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), ratified by 197 parties, aims to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
2. The insufficient financial commitments from developed nations to the Green Climate Fund (GCF) strongly suggest that developing economies will face exacerbated challenges in adapting to and mitigating climate change impacts.
3. A truly equitable global climate policy must prioritize climate justice, ensuring that historical polluters bear the primary responsibility for funding adaptation and mitigation efforts in vulnerable nations.
4. Despite numerous international agreements and pledges, global greenhouse gas emissions have continued to rise almost uninterruptedly since the first Earth Summit in 1992, with a brief dip during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Options:
(A) FIJF
(B) FJIF
(C) IFJJ
(D) JFFI
(E) FIFJ

Correct Answer: A

1. Statement 1 Analysis: This is a Fact (F). The statement describes the verifiable objective and ratification status of a specific international treaty (UNFCCC). This information can be confirmed by consulting official documents related to the convention, making it an objective piece of data.

2. Statement 2 Analysis: This is an Inference (I). The statement draws a conclusion about a future outcome ('developing economies will face exacerbated challenges') based on a known premise ('insufficient financial commitments'). The phrase "strongly suggest" indicates a logical deduction or projection of an expected consequence, rather than a definitively established event or a subjective opinion.

3. Statement 3 Analysis: This is a Judgement (J). The statement expresses a normative opinion on what a climate policy 'must prioritize' and what is 'equitable'. Phrases like "must prioritize" and "ensuring that historical polluters bear the primary responsibility" articulate a prescriptive stance and a moral framework, reflecting an author's approval or disapproval of current or proposed approaches.

4. Statement 4 Analysis: This is a Fact (F). This statement presents verifiable historical data regarding the trend of global greenhouse gas emissions and references specific historical events (Earth Summit in 1992, COVID-19 pandemic). Such trends and events are objectively measurable and documented by climate science institutions and historical records.

Logical Trap: A common error lies in misclassifying Statement 2. Students might mistake it for a Fact because it builds on verifiable information (insufficient financial commitments) or for a Judgement due to the negative implication of "exacerbated challenges." However, it is an Inference because it projects a *probable future outcome* based on current trends and known conditions, indicated by the phrase "strongly suggest," which does not assert a certainty but rather a highly likely conclusion. Similarly, Statement 3 might be seen as an inference about what would lead to an equitable policy, but the use of "must prioritize" immediately elevates it to a prescriptive opinion or a moral imperative, making it a clear Judgement.

← →

Keep Learning?