All Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension (VARC) Practice

All Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension (VARC) 37 / 557

The following question has a set of four statements. Each statement can be classified as one of the following:
(i) Facts, which deal with pieces of information that one has heard, seen or read, and which are open to discovery or verification (the answer option indicates such a statement with an F)
(ii) Inferences, which are conclusions drawn about the unknown, on the basis of the known (the answer option indicates such a statement with an I)
(iii) Judgements, which are opinions that imply approval or disapproval of persons, objects, situations and occurrences in the past, the present or the future (the answer option indicates such a statement with a J)
Identify the Fact (F), Judgement (J) and Inference (I) from these sentences.

Statements:

1. Many developed nations, including Canada and the United Kingdom, operate universal healthcare systems primarily funded through general taxation, ensuring access to medical services regardless of socioeconomic status.
2. The increasing global prevalence of non-communicable diseases and an aging demographic structure imply that sustainable universal healthcare coverage will necessitate a fundamental re-evaluation of current funding mechanisms and service delivery paradigms.
3. It is regrettable that despite ample evidence demonstrating superior public health outcomes, many economically powerful nations continue to resist the comprehensive adoption of single-payer universal healthcare models due to vested political and economic interests.
4. Official data from the World Health Organization (WHO) indicates that countries with a higher proportion of public spending on health generally exhibit lower out-of-pocket health expenditures for their citizens.

Options:
(A) FIJF
(B) FIFJ
(C) JFIF
(D) IJFJ
(E) FJIF

Correct Answer: A

1. Statement 1 Analysis: This is a Fact (F). The statement presents verifiable information about the operational and funding characteristics of universal healthcare systems in specific countries (Canada, UK). These details can be confirmed through official government health reports and international comparative studies, making it an objective piece of data.

2. Statement 2 Analysis: This is an Inference (I). The statement draws a logical conclusion about future necessities ('will necessitate a fundamental re-evaluation') based on known global trends: increasing non-communicable diseases and aging populations. The use of 'imply that' signals a reasoned projection about what will likely be required, rather than a definitively established fact or a subjective opinion.

3. Statement 3 Analysis: This is a Judgement (J). The phrase "It is regrettable that" explicitly introduces an expression of disapproval or negative sentiment from the author. Furthermore, attributing resistance to "vested political and economic interests" is an interpretive opinion about motivations, which cannot be objectively verified as a fact.

4. Statement 4 Analysis: This is a Fact (F). The statement refers to "Official data from the World Health Organization (WHO)" as its source and describes a specific, verifiable correlation between public health spending and out-of-pocket expenditures. This is a statistical finding that can be empirically checked against WHO publications, making it an objective piece of information.

Logical Trap: A common logical trap in this question involves statement 3. While the claim of "ample evidence demonstrating superior public health outcomes" might seem factual, the overall framing with "It is regrettable that" and the attribution of resistance to "vested political and economic interests" transforms the statement into a clear judgment. Students might mistakenly classify it as a mixed F-J or an inference if they focus only on parts of the statement rather than its overarching tone and intent. Similarly, statement 2, being a predictive statement, could be mistaken for a judgment, but its reliance on logical deduction from known facts, rather than personal approval or disapproval, firmly places it as an inference.

← →

Keep Learning?