Toppercracker
♫
Now Playing
Ambient Radio
♫

Keep Learning?

Sign in to continue practicing.

Critical Reasoning 23 / 52

Assumption (Unstated premise required for the conclusion)

Stimulus: Recent neuroscientific studies have observed that individuals who frequently engage in complex strategic gaming exhibit a significantly higher density of synaptic connections in the prefrontal cortex compared to the general population. Based on this correlation, proponents of cognitive gamification argue that integrating high-level strategy games into secondary school curricula will directly cause an increase in the baseline analytical intelligence of students.

Question: Which of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

(A) The prefrontal cortex is the primary region of the brain responsible for the processing of emotional intelligence and social cues.
(B) Students in secondary school possess the requisite psychological maturity to engage with high-level strategic games effectively.
(C) The increased synaptic density observed in strategic gamers is a result of their gaming activity rather than a pre-existing biological trait that predisposes them to enjoy such games.
(D) Regular engagement in strategic gaming is more effective at increasing synaptic density than traditional pedagogical methods such as mathematics or rote memorization.

Correct Answer: C
1. Breakdown of the Argument: * Premise: There is a correlation between frequent strategic gaming and higher synaptic density in the prefrontal cortex.
Conclusion: Implementing gaming in schools will cause an increase in students' analytical intelligence.
2. Logical Analysis: The argument suffers from a classic "correlation vs. causation" flaw. It assumes that gaming causes the neural changes. However, if individuals with naturally higher synaptic density are simply more likely to be drawn to strategic gaming (reverse causality or selection bias), then forcing students to game will not necessarily change their brain structure. For the conclusion to hold, we must assume that the gaming is the cause and not the effect.
3. Why the other options are incorrect: * (A) This discusses emotional intelligence, which is outside the scope of the argument’s focus on "analytical intelligence."
(B) While maturity might be a practical concern for implementation, the logical link between gaming and intelligence does not strictly depend on it for the causal theory to be valid.
(D) The argument claims that gaming will cause an increase; it does not need to prove that gaming is better than every other possible method, only that it works as stated.

← →