Fact, Inference, and Judgement Practice

Fact, Inference, and Judgement 15 / 50

The following question has a set of four statements. Each statement can be classified as one of the following:
(i) Facts, which deal with pieces of information that one has heard, seen or read, and which are open to discovery or verification (the answer option indicates such a statement with an F)
(ii) Inferences, which are conclusions drawn about the unknown, on the basis of the known (the answer option indicates such a statement with an I)
(iii) Judgements, which are opinions that imply approval or disapproval of persons, objects, situations and occurrences in the past, the present or the future (the answer option indicates such a statement with a J)
Identify the Fact (F), Judgement (J) and Inference (I) from these sentences.

Statements:

1. The first successful sequencing of the entire human genome was announced in 2003 by the Human Genome Project consortium, an international collaborative research effort.
2. The increasing commercialization of gene-editing tools by private entities without robust governmental oversight fundamentally compromises the principles of equitable access to essential biotechnological advancements.
3. Should current trends in biotechnological entrepreneurship continue, it is highly probable that future therapeutic applications of genetic engineering will initially be accessible primarily to affluent populations, exacerbating global health disparities.
4. The debate surrounding germline gene editing encompasses diverse perspectives from religious leaders, scientists, ethicists, and policymakers concerning its ethical implications for future generations.

Options:
(A) FIJF
(B) FJIF
(C) IFJJ
(D) JIFI
(E) FIFJ

Correct Answer: B

1. Statement 1 Analysis: This is a Fact (F). It provides specific, verifiable information about a historical scientific event (the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003) and its nature (an international collaborative research effort). This information can be objectively confirmed through historical records and scientific literature, without any expression of opinion or projection.

2. Statement 2 Analysis: This is a Judgement (J). The statement uses strong evaluative language such as "fundamentally compromises" and implies a value system regarding "equitable access to essential biotechnological advancements." This reflects the author's disapproval of the current situation and how it impacts ethical principles, making it an opinion rather than an objective truth.

3. Statement 3 Analysis: This is an Inference (I). It draws a conclusion about a future likelihood ("highly probable that future therapeutic applications... will initially be accessible primarily to affluent populations") based on a hypothetical condition ("Should current trends in biotechnological entrepreneurship continue"). The statement projects an outcome based on existing patterns but does not express a definitive fact or a subjective moral stance, making it a reasoned deduction.

4. Statement 4 Analysis: This is a Fact (F). It describes a verifiable state of affairs: the existence of a wide-ranging debate about germline gene editing involving various stakeholders (religious leaders, scientists, ethicists, policymakers) and its subject matter (ethical implications). The statement objectively reports on the nature and participants of an ongoing discussion without expressing an opinion on the debate's merits or outcomes.

Logical Trap: A common mistake is to confuse an Inference (like Statement 3) with a Judgement, especially when the projected outcome has negative societal implications. While the inference points to a problematic future, it does so based on an assessment of trends ("highly probable") rather than an explicit moral condemnation ("should not happen"). Similarly, Statement 4 might be misconstrued as a Judgment if one assumes the statement itself is entering the debate, but it merely states the verifiable existence and composition of the debate, which is a factual observation.

← →

Keep Learning?