Toppercracker
♫
Now Playing
Ambient Radio
♫

Keep Learning?

Sign in to continue practicing.

Fact, Inference, and Judgement 19 / 50

The following question has a set of four statements. Each statement can be classified as one of the following:
(i) Facts, which deal with pieces of information that one has heard, seen or read, and which are open to discovery or verification (the answer option indicates such a statement with an F)
(ii) Inferences, which are conclusions drawn about the unknown, on the basis of the known (the answer option indicates such a statement with an I)
(iii) Judgements, which are opinions that imply approval or disapproval of persons, objects, situations and occurrences in the past, the present or the future (the answer option indicates such a statement with a J)
Identify the Fact (F), Judgement (J) and Inference (I) from these sentences.

Statements:
1. The Bretton Woods Agreement of 1944 established the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank to govern the post-war international monetary order.
2. Given the current trend of decentralization in digital finance, traditional banking institutions will likely face a significant erosion of their monopoly over cross-border transactions by 2030.
3. The relentless pursuit of algorithmic efficiency in social media platforms is a corrosive influence that prioritizes engagement metrics over the psychological well-being of the individual.
4. It is imperative that international regulatory bodies formulate a comprehensive ethical framework to govern the deployment of autonomous weapon systems.

Options:
(A) FIJJ
(B) FIIJ
(C) IFJJ
(D) FIJF
(E) FFJJ

Correct Answer: A

1. Statement 1 Analysis: This is a Fact (F). It describes a specific historical event (the 1944 Bretifiable Woods Agreement) and its objective outcomes (the creation of the IMF and World Bank). This information can be verified through historical records and does not contain the author’s subjective bias.

2. Statement 2 Analysis: This is an Inference (I). It draws a conclusion about the "unknown" (the future state of banking in 2030) based on the "known" (the current trend of decentralization). The use of the word "likely" signals a logical projection rather than a verified fact or a pure value judgement.

3. Statement 3 Analysis: This is a Judgement (J). The author uses highly qualitative and emotive language such as "relentless pursuit," "corrosive influence," and "prioritizes... over well-being." These reflect a subjective disapproval and an opinionated interpretation of the situation.

4. Statement 4 Analysis: This is a Judgement (J). The phrase "It is imperative" indicates a prescriptive opinion or a moral stance on what should be done. Statements that suggest a necessity or an ethical obligation are matters of opinion and cannot be verified as objective data.

Logical Trap: A frequent error is misclassifying Statement 4 as an Inference because it seems like a "logical necessity" for safety. However, any statement that dictates a "must," "should," or "imperative" is an expression of the author's approval or disapproval of a future course of action, placing it firmly in the category of a Judgement.

← →