Now Playing
Ambient Radio

Keep Learning?

Sign in to continue practicing.

The following question has a set of four statements. Each statement can be classified as one of the following:
(i) Facts, which deal with pieces of information that one has heard, seen or read, and which are open to discovery or verification (the answer option indicates such a statement with an F)
(ii) Inferences, which are conclusions drawn about the unknown, on the basis of the known (the answer option indicates such a statement with an I)
(iii) Judgements, which are opinions that imply approval or disapproval of persons, objects, situations and occurrences in the past, the present or the future (the answer option indicates such a statement with a J)
Identify the Fact (F), Judgement (J) and Inference (I) from these sentences.

Statements:
1. Global agricultural output of cereals has seen a continuous increase over the past five decades, rising from approximately 1.8 billion metric tons in 1980 to over 2.7 billion metric tons by 2020, primarily due to advances in mechanization, fertilization, and crop breeding.
2. The escalating frequency of extreme weather events, combined with plateauing yield gains from conventional methods, implies that widespread adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices will be crucial for maintaining global food security in the coming decades.
3. It is ethically indefensible for major agricultural corporations to patent indigenous plant varieties, thereby undermining traditional farming practices and exacerbating inequalities in global seed access.
4. Investment in agricultural research and development (R&D) across OECD countries, as a percentage of agricultural GDP, has declined steadily from an average of 0.8% in 1990 to 0.5% in 2018.

Options:
(A) FIJF
(B) FJJI
(C) IFJF
(D) JIFI
(E) FIFJ

Correct Answer: A

1. Statement 1 Analysis: This is a Fact (F). The statement provides specific, verifiable statistical data (e.g., 1.8 billion metric tons in 1980, 2.7 billion metric tons by 2020) and attributes the increase to well-documented agricultural advancements. Such information is objectively discoverable and can be cross-referenced with agricultural reports and historical data.

2. Statement 2 Analysis: This is an Inference (I). The statement draws a logical conclusion about a future necessity ('will be crucial') based on current and known trends ('escalating frequency of extreme weather events', 'plateauing yield gains'). The word 'implies' explicitly signals a conclusion drawn from existing facts about an anticipated future condition or requirement, not a subjective opinion or moral stance.

3. Statement 3 Analysis: This is a Judgement (J). The statement expresses a strong ethical disapproval using value-laden language such as 'ethically indefensible', 'undermining', and 'exacerbating inequalities'. These terms reflect a subjective moral assessment of corporate actions and their perceived negative consequences, clearly indicating an opinion rather than a verifiable fact or a logical deduction.

4. Statement 4 Analysis: This is a Fact (F). The statement presents concrete, quantifiable data regarding a historical trend: the decline in agricultural R&D investment as a percentage of agricultural GDP in OECD countries over specific years. These figures are verifiable through economic and agricultural statistical databases, thus constituting objective information.

Logical Trap: A common error in this type of question is confusing a strong inference about necessity with a subjective judgement. For instance, in Statement 2, the phrase "will be crucial for maintaining global food security" might seem like a judgement due to its assertive tone. However, it functions as a logical consequence or a necessary condition derived from the stated factual premises (extreme weather, plateauing yields) to achieve a particular objective (food security). It does not convey a moral imperative or a personal approval/disapproval, unlike Statement 3's use of "ethically indefensible," which unequivocally marks it as a judgement.