Toppercracker
♫
Now Playing
Ambient Radio
♫

Keep Learning?

Sign in to continue practicing.

Missing Sentence 6 / 54

The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where the given sentence best fits among the options (1), (2), (3), or (4) indicated in the paragraph.

Sentence: Heightened geopolitical rivalries, coupled with pandemic-induced supply chain shocks, have accelerated a strategic re-evaluation of national economic resilience.

Paragraph: The post-Cold War era ushered in an unprecedented period of economic interdependence, largely driven by a policy consensus favoring open markets and global supply chains. (1) This integration was predicated on the belief that economic entanglement would deter geopolitical conflicts, fostering a more stable international order. However, recent years have witnessed a significant reversal, characterized by increasing protectionism and the weaponization of economic tools. (2) Nations are now actively pursuing strategies like 'friend-shoring' and diversification to mitigate over-reliance on potential adversaries, fundamentally altering the architecture of global commerce. (3) The economic ramifications of such a re-architecture are complex, potentially leading to higher costs, reduced efficiency, and fragmentation of the global economy, challenging the very tenets of free trade. (4)

Correct Answer: Option 2
1. Logical Contextual Analysis:
Before Option 2: The paragraph describes a "significant reversal" from economic interdependence, marked by "increasing protectionism and the weaponization of economic tools."
The Inserted Sentence: This sentence provides the crucial causal link, explaining *why* this reversal is occurring (due to "geopolitical rivalries" and "supply chain shocks") and introducing the new concept of a "strategic re-evaluation of national economic resilience."
After Option 2: The subsequent sentence elaborates on this "strategic re-evaluation" by detailing the specific actions nations are taking ("friend-shoring" and "diversification") to achieve "national economic resilience," thereby providing concrete examples of the changes implied by the inserted sentence.
2. Why the other options are incorrect:
Option 1: Placing the sentence here would interrupt the historical context of interdependence and the belief system behind it, as the "reversal" has not yet been introduced. The drivers of the reversal would not make sense before the reversal itself.
Option 3: While the inserted sentence introduces "strategic re-evaluation," placing it here would disrupt the immediate connection between this re-evaluation and the specific strategies (friend-shoring, diversification) that directly result from it. The current sentence after Option 2 exemplifies the re-evaluation, and inserting the missing sentence at Option 3 would separate the action from its cause.
Option 4: This position is too late. The sentence details the *causes* and *nature* of the shift in policy, which has already been exemplified by the preceding sentences. Placing it here would be redundant and would not provide the necessary foundation for the discussion of economic ramifications that follows.
3. Placement Summary:
The sentence logically explains the impetus for the shift in trade policy, bridging the general observation of a reversal with the specific strategic actions nations are undertaking.

← →