Odd Sentence Out Practice | Topper Cracker

Odd Sentence Out 18 / 54

The following five sentences, labeled 1 to 5, relate to a single topic. Four of these sentences can be arranged to form a logical paragraph. Identify the sentence that does not fit with the others and enter its number as your answer.

1. The prospect of germline genetic enhancement raises profound ethical dilemmas, particularly regarding the potential for exacerbating existing social inequalities and creating a novel form of genetic stratification.
2. Proponents, however, contend that genetic engineering offers unparalleled opportunities for eradicating severe hereditary diseases, thereby alleviating immense human suffering across generations.
3. Critics argue that permitting the selection of desirable traits risks the commodification of human life and could establish a new form of eugenics, driven more by market forces than by state mandates.
4. This quest for "designer babies" could fundamentally alter our understanding of human dignity, fostering a society where unenhanced individuals are marginalized or deemed inherently inferior.
5. Such interventions blur the traditional lines between therapy and enhancement, prompting complex philosophical questions about the very definition of normalcy and what constitutes a desirable human attribute.

Correct Answer: 2
Identification of the Theme: The core argument revolves around the ethical quandaries and societal risks associated with human germline genetic enhancement, specifically the concept of "designer babies," focusing on potential for inequality, commodification, and altered human dignity.
Logical Sequence of the Coherent Paragraph: 1-3-4-5.
Sentence 1: Introduces the overarching ethical dilemmas of germline enhancement, specifically pointing to social inequality and genetic stratification.
Sentence 3: Expands on these dilemmas by discussing the risks of commodification of life and a market-driven eugenics, building on the initial concerns.
Sentence 4: Further elaborates on the societal impact, highlighting the potential for diminished human dignity and the marginalization of unenhanced individuals.
Sentence 5: Concludes by framing the philosophical challenge: the blurring of therapy and enhancement, which necessitates a re-evaluation of human normalcy and desired traits.
Why Sentence 2 is the Odd One Out: While Sentence 2 is topically related to genetic engineering, it shifts the focus to the therapeutic benefits of the technology, specifically disease eradication. The other four sentences are critically examining the ethical pitfalls and societal dangers of genetic enhancement (designer babies), exploring concerns like inequality, commodification, and human dignity. Sentence 2 presents an argument in favor of genetic engineering for therapeutic purposes, which is a distinctly different aspect and a counter-point to the critical ethical discussion that forms the coherent paragraph.

← →

Keep Learning?