Odd Sentence Out Practice | Topper Cracker

Odd Sentence Out 37 / 54

The following five sentences, labeled 1 to 5, relate to a single topic. Four of these sentences can be arranged to form a logical paragraph. Identify the sentence that does not fit with the others and enter its number as your answer.

1. The aspiration to deliberately engineer desirable genetic characteristics in human offspring precipitates a profound societal and ethical reckoning, challenging foundational concepts of intrinsic human worth and natural biological variation.
2. Present-day germline editing technologies, despite their rapid advancement, continue to grapple with inherent challenges such as off-target edits and problematic mosaicism, posing substantial safety and efficacy concerns for future clinical translation.
3. A primary ethical contention posits that such interventions could initiate a 'slippery slope' towards a new form of eugenics, exacerbating socio-economic disparities by creating a genetic divide between the 'enhanced' and 'unenhanced'.
4. Furthermore, allowing parents to select specific traits might inadvertently diminish the child's future autonomy, constraining their 'right to an open future' by imposing predetermined genetic pathways and expectations.
5. This pursuit risks shifting the perception of children from individuals valued for their inherent personhood to products optimized for parental desires, thereby commodifying human genetic identity.

Correct Answer: 2
Identification of the Theme: The core argument discusses the profound ethical, philosophical, and societal implications of human genetic engineering, particularly concerning its potential to redefine human worth, promote eugenics, commodify individuals, and compromise future autonomy.
Logical Sequence of the Coherent Paragraph: 1-3-5-4.
Sentence 1: Introduces the central ethical and societal challenge posed by genetic engineering to intrinsic human worth and natural variation.
Sentence 3: Elaborates on a significant ethical concern, linking genetic interventions to eugenics and the potential for increased socio-economic stratification.
Sentence 5: Deepens the philosophical critique by explaining how such practices might lead to the commodification of human identity, viewing children as products rather than inherent persons.
Sentence 4: Adds another layer of ethical concern by addressing the potential infringement on a child's autonomy and their 'right to an open future' due to predetermined genetic pathways.
Why Sentence 2 is the Odd One Out: While Sentence 2 is topically related to genetic engineering, it shifts the focus from the ethical, philosophical, and societal ramifications (which are the core of sentences 1, 3, 4, and 5) to the technical and practical challenges of the gene-editing process itself, specifically concerns about safety and efficacy (off-target edits, mosaicism) in clinical application. It addresses the mechanics and limitations of the technology rather than its moral or social consequences.

← →

Keep Learning?