Toppercracker
♫
Now Playing
Ambient Radio
♫

Keep Learning?

Sign in to continue practicing.

Paragraph Completion 11 / 53

CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology offers unprecedented precision in modifying DNA, heralding a new era for therapeutic interventions against genetic diseases. While its potential to cure debilitating conditions is immense, its capability extends to altering germline cells, meaning changes can be passed down to future generations. This profound power necessitates urgent and careful consideration of the ethical boundaries governing human genetic modification, particularly concerning questions of human enhancement and the long-term impact on the human genome.

Which of the following sentences best completes this paragraph?

A. Therefore, establishing comprehensive regulatory frameworks and fostering global ethical discourse are critical steps toward responsible application of this transformative technology.
B. However, the costs associated with widespread CRISPR therapy remain a significant barrier for equitable access in many parts of the world.
C. Many leading scientists advocate for a temporary moratorium on germline editing until more is understood about its long-term effects on human development.
D. Moreover, the public's understanding of genetic engineering must be improved to ensure informed societal participation in these complex debates.

Correct Answer: A
Why A works: The paragraph outlines the revolutionary power of CRISPR, highlights its germline editing capabilities, and explicitly states the urgent need for considering ethical boundaries concerning human enhancement and long-term impact. Option A provides the logical capstone by suggesting the necessary steps—establishing regulatory frameworks and fostering global ethical discourse—to responsibly navigate these profound implications directly stemming from the preceding discussion.
Why B fails: While the economic aspect of CRISPR accessibility is a valid concern, it introduces a new topic (cost/equity) that is not directly developed by the preceding sentences, which focus specifically on the ethical dilemmas of modification and intergenerational impact, rather than distribution.
Why C fails: This option proposes a specific action (a moratorium), which is one potential outcome or proposal within the ethical debate, rather than a broader conclusion about the essential approach to the ethical challenges themselves. The paragraph builds the case for the *problem* and the *need for consideration*, not for a specific solution.
Why D fails: Improving public understanding is indeed crucial for informed debate, but it functions more as a prerequisite for the ethical discourse rather than the ultimate conclusion of the paragraph's argument about the ethical boundaries and long-term impacts that need to be addressed. It's a step toward the solution, not the encompassing solution or necessary overarching action.

← →