Toppercracker
♫
Now Playing
Ambient Radio
♫

Keep Learning?

Sign in to continue practicing.

Para-jumbles 26 / 100

a. Consequently, addressing this philosophical quandary requires more than just advanced neuroscience; it demands a re-evaluation of our basic understanding of mind and matter.
b. This distinction highlights a fundamental explanatory gap, as even a complete understanding of neural correlates does not inherently reveal *why* these processes are accompanied by subjective feelings.
c. The "hard problem" of consciousness refers to the challenge of explaining how physical processes in the brain give rise to subjective experience, or qualia.
d. Unlike the "easy problems" which deal with functional aspects like attention and memory, the hard problem questions the very existence of phenomenal consciousness itself.

These sentences, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Which of the options best outline their correct order?

1. c, d, a, b

2. d, c, b, a

3. c, d, b, a

4. b, c, d, a

Correct Answer: 3 (c, d, b, a)
To solve "Sentence Rearrangement" or "Para-jumble" tasks, look for the logical flow of ideas:
Step 1 (Introduction): Sentence (c) serves as the ideal introduction by defining the core concept, "the 'hard problem' of consciousness," and establishing its central challenge: the explanation of subjective experience from physical processes.
Step 2 (Elaboration): Sentence (d) logically follows by elaborating on the "hard problem" through contrast. It distinguishes it from the "easy problems" and clarifies what makes it unique, using the comparative phrase "Unlike the 'easy problems'."
Step 3 (Secondary Factor): Sentence (b) builds upon the distinction made in (d). The phrase "This distinction" in (b) directly refers to the contrast between hard and easy problems, explaining the resulting "explanatory gap" and the persistence of the "why" question even with neural understanding.
Step 4 (Conclusion/Result): Sentence (a) acts as the conclusion, starting with "Consequently." It summarizes the implications of this deep philosophical quandary, suggesting that its resolution necessitates a broader reassessment beyond just neuroscience.

← →