Now Playing
Ambient Radio

Keep Learning?

Sign in to continue practicing.

Choose the option that best corrects the grammatical or logical error in the underlined fragment.

To mitigate the accelerating depletion of natural resources, policy frameworks that prioritize sustainable consumption, rather than merely incremental reforms, are advocated by environmental experts.

A. (No change)
B. environmental experts advocate policy frameworks that prioritize sustainable consumption, rather than merely incremental reforms.
C. the advocacy of policy frameworks that prioritize sustainable consumption, rather than merely incremental reforms, is essential for environmental experts to mitigate the accelerating depletion of natural resources.
D. environmental experts, in order to mitigate the accelerating depletion of natural resources, advocate policy frameworks that prioritize sustainable consumption rather than merely incremental reforms.

1. Identification of Error: Dangling Infinitive Phrase and Logical Subject Inconsistency.
2. Grammatical Rule: An introductory participial or infinitive phrase must logically modify the grammatical subject of the main clause. Here, the phrase "To mitigate the accelerating depletion of natural resources" implies an agent capable of performing the action of mitigating (the environmental experts), but the grammatical subject of the original main clause is "policy frameworks," which cannot directly perform this action.
3. Option Elimination:
A. Incorrect — The introductory infinitive phrase "To mitigate..." dangles, as its logical subject (environmental experts) is not the grammatical subject of the main clause ("policy frameworks").
B. Correct — The phrase "To mitigate the accelerating depletion of natural resources" now correctly modifies "environmental experts," who are the grammatical subject of the active main clause, thereby establishing logical consistency.
C. Incorrect — This option is grammatically awkward and fundamentally changes the original meaning and structure, introducing a convoluted construction rather than directly correcting the dangling modifier.
D. Incorrect — While "environmental experts, in order to mitigate..." correctly links the purpose to the experts, the placement of "in order to mitigate" as an interrupter makes the sentence slightly less concise than option B, which maintains the initial adverbial phrase while correcting the logical subject. Option B is a more direct and elegant fix.